Tag Archives: International Criminal Court

April 7: Has the U.S. Already Crossed the Line into War Crimes?

It is Monday morning, April 6, 2026. We are exactly 39 hours away from a deadline that was set not in a diplomatic cable, and not in a briefing room, but on a social media platform in the middle of … Continue reading →

Posted in In the News | Tagged Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, Article 54 of Additional Protocol I, B1 Bridge, Bridge Day, CAIR, civilian infrastructure, Collective Punishment, Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, Council on American-Islamic Relations, crime against humanity, deadline, discriminatory intent, Doctrine of Command Responsibility, Donald Trump, double-tap, Geneva Convention, guilt, hors de combat, indiscriminate, infrastructure, infrastructure targeting, intent, International Criminal Court, iran, iran war, missile strike, NATO, No Quarter, Operation Epic Fury, Pope Leo XIV, Power Plant Day, Principle of Proportionality, reckless, religion, religious persecution, Rome Statute, Shajarah Tayyebeh girls' school, Sizdah Be-dar, stale intelligence, stone ages, stupid rules of engagement, triple-tap, war crime, water desalination systems | 1 Comment

The 48-Hour Ultimatum Wasn’t “Tough Talk.” It Was a Legal Line Being Crossed.

On Saturday, the world got a countdown: Open the Strait of Hormuz in 48 hours – or face the “obliteration” of Iran’s power grid. “Starting with the biggest one first.” By Monday, March 23, 2026, that deadline shifted. A new … Continue reading →

Posted in In the News | Tagged civilian infrastructure, Donald Trump, Geneva Conventions, ICC, immunity, International Criminal Court, international law, iran, iran war, leverage, negotiating tactic, normalization, official acts, pete hegseth, power grid, presidential immunity, richard nixon, secretary of defense, secretary of war, Strait of Hormuz, supreme court, ultimatum, war crime | 1 Comment

Tehran’s Black Rain and Broken Futures: Why Oil Must Be a “No-Go Zone” in War

Imagine a weapon you can’t see, can’t aim, and that keeps killing for decades after it’s deployed. War already has one. In Tehran tonight, the scene is apocalyptic. Residents describe a ‘black monster’ swallowing the sky as a glow of … Continue reading →

Posted in In the News | Tagged 2026 Baku Climate Summit, 9/11, acute respiratory distress, Additional Protocol I, agents of torture, alter dna, Article 54 of Protocol 1, benzene, birth defects, black rain, blood-brain barier, can't breathe, cancer, chemical attack, chemical burns, chemical warfare, Chernobyl, collapsing ecosystems, crude oil, cruel, dna damage, fine particulate matter, food supply, free pass, Geneva Conventions, genotoxins, Global Environmental Sanctuary, ICC, IFRC, IHL, indiscriminate, International Court of Justice, International Criminal Court, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, iran war, Iranian Red Crescent Society, israel, leukemia, Military Exemption, mutagenic, mutations, nitrogen oxide, oil refinerry, oil tanks, oil targets, Operation Epic Fury, Operation Roaring Lion, Polluter Pays Principle, PPP, regime change, Rome Statute, russia, soot-cough, starve the regime, success tax, sulfur dioxide, superpowers, Tehran, toothless tiger, toxic, ukraine, UN Compensation Commission, UNCC, victor's justics, war rules, water treatment plants | 3 Comments

Tag Archives: International Criminal Court

April 7: Has the U.S. Already Crossed the Line into War Crimes?

The 48-Hour Ultimatum Wasn’t “Tough Talk.” It Was a Legal Line Being Crossed.

Tehran’s Black Rain and Broken Futures: Why Oil Must Be a “No-Go Zone” in War

Recent Posts

Categories

Meta